<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweefind improve Twitter user ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pupuweb.com/blog/tweefind-good-for-ranking-twitter-users-not-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pupuweb.com/blog/tweefind-good-for-ranking-twitter-users-not-search/</link>
	<description>Review Info for Tech, Fashion, Living and IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PhilGo20</title>
		<link>http://www.pupuweb.com/blog/tweefind-good-for-ranking-twitter-users-not-search/comment-page-1/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilGo20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pupuweb.com/blog/?p=2474#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>Main problem with these tools is the lack of relevancy of their ranking system : influence is seen as a generic thing, not tied to a domain, topic or area of expertise. I don&#039;t think Shaq or Ashton Kutcher are very influential in programming circles...

http://bit.ly/7zgjBl 
Just wrote a post about their lack of relevancy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Main problem with these tools is the lack of relevancy of their ranking system : influence is seen as a generic thing, not tied to a domain, topic or area of expertise. I don&#8217;t think Shaq or Ashton Kutcher are very influential in programming circles&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/7zgjBl" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7zgjBl</a><br />
Just wrote a post about their lack of relevancy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
